92 Game agent programme: commission and the downline

What the Agency screen shows

The header displays yesterday’s total commission, with the note that upgrading the level increases commission income. Below it, two columns of statistics split the downline in two.

Direct versus team subordinates

Direct subordinates registered through your own link. Team subordinates are the wider downline — people recruited by your direct subordinates and below.

Both are measured on the same four numbers: how many registered, how many deposited, how much they deposited, and how many made a first deposit. The emphasis is worth noticing — every metric on the screen is a deposit metric. Registrations alone are tracked but not what pays.

How commission accrues

Commission is calculated on downline activity and reported daily, with yesterday’s total as the headline. Level raises the rate, in the same way VIP level raises the rebate rate.

The platform does not publish a per-level commission table. That is a genuine gap: it means the rate you are working toward cannot be checked from outside the app, and any figure quoted by a third party promoting the programme is unverifiable.

What the model actually rewards

This is worth stating plainly, because the agency framing — levels, teams, commission, a dedicated support line — borrows the vocabulary of employment without any of its substance.

The people most easily recruited into a downline are friends, relatives and neighbours — the people whose losses you will hear about. That is a real cost, and it does not appear anywhere on the Agency screen.

There is also no wage, no floor and no guarantee. Commission is entirely contingent on other people’s continued deposits, which makes it irregular by construction. Anyone presenting agency work on a platform like this as a stable income is describing something that does not exist — see the real or fake page on why the “earning app” framing fails.

Finally, the activity rules apply here too: one claim per phone number, payment method and IP address, with group control and multi-accounting explicitly prohibited. Building a downline out of accounts you control yourself is both detectable and grounds for a frozen balance.

What is not published

The Agency screen is data-rich about your downline and silent about the terms that govern your earnings. The gap is consistent across the platform’s level-based systems.

• No commission rate table. Level raises commission income; by how much is not stated.
• No level threshold table. What moves an agent up a level is undocumented, as with VIP levels.
• No depth limit. Team subordinates are tracked, but how many levels deep commission actually reaches is not specified.
• No payment schedule. Commission is reported daily; when and how it becomes withdrawable is not set out.

Commission detail and Rebate ratio on the Agency screen are where these figures surface in-app. That is the only reliable source — any commission rate quoted by a site promoting the programme is unverifiable, and such sites are generally earning commission themselves.

What you can actually see

To be fair to the programme, the reporting on the downline is genuinely detailed — arguably more so than the terms deserve.

For both direct and team subordinates you get registrations, how many have deposited, total deposit amount, and how many made a first deposit. That is enough to see conversion at each stage: how many of the people you invited registered, and how many of those went on to deposit.

It is worth looking at that funnel honestly if you are considering the programme. In most referral schemes of this kind the drop-off between registration and repeat deposit is severe, and the same tiering that applies to partner rewards — where the first deposit does not count at all — suggests the platform expects it too.